Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

August 10 2017

gutscakeearshot

July 05 2017

gutscakeearshot
0376 5855
Reposted byShingomur Shingomur

June 21 2017

gutscakeearshot
8443 9e49 500
Reposted byNessoodlenvmpankamienUbikmemesjaszHereNamebiauekratekKurkaWyluzujAmericanloverlargehamstercollidergketkerosinewasnaehgnn-nudelsalatmendelhurraxalstrzepynaichperohryzGei0rQudacimfmfmfghalbadiousfretkakalesonMagoryankrybusofbitchesandbutterfliesskizzoratmanithehedgehogsdilemmaszarakoszularashfaelkrimsonfafnirscaveteijakoolwonkololufonaochancongrevefillandiaschlachtoroselcommendanterazieliniinayajulannankinsucznikcrispybonesbeqp125petrofinkreghLykou

June 08 2017

gutscakeearshot
7615 9e62
Reposted byki-adipenispenispenislol

May 27 2017

gutscakeearshot
4628 13c8 500

May 26 2017

gutscakeearshot
I would love to answer your question, but this is low-resoluted as fuck!

Don't you have this in HD?

May 24 2017

gutscakeearshot
gutscakeearshot
2303 2833 500
Reposted bypati2k6cieniolubek

April 05 2017

2489 d6c0 500

chrisevansisbeautiful:

note-a-bear:

Reblog the money dog in 50 seconds and money will find you

OKAY FOLKS I AM NOT KIDDING YOU -  I JUST WON 500 EUROS ON A SCRATCHER I BOUGHT DURING LUNCH BREAK

March 29 2017

gutscakeearshot

March 27 2017

gutscakeearshot
6892 a2c7 500

March 15 2017

gutscakeearshot
9619 dfd9
gutscakeearshot

February 26 2017

gutscakeearshot
1984 aa24 500

February 22 2017

gutscakeearshot
Play fullscreen
just to clear things up.
gutscakeearshot

RE: Punching Nazis

Every liberal democracy realizes early on there are some positions which must prima facie [at first sight] be aggressively excluded from public discourse. You can't even articulate WHY they are unreasonable because to articulate WHY they are unreasonable is to itself open the possibility of reason. This is why you can't allow "just hypothetical" questions about whether Jews or blacks, as Spencer posits, are innately inferior/destroyable.

Nazi theorists like Carl Schmitt VERY QUICKLY diagnosed this weakness in liberal democracies. You can collapse a democracy by insisting the democracy had a right to end itself: Hindenburg to Hitler, "the peaceful transition of power". Intolerance cannot be tolerated, because this corrosive effect means the law can be co-opted by, and so protective of, fascism.

Fascism wriggles into democracies by insisting on right to be heard, achieves critical mass, then dissolves the organs that installed it, which means the stronger it becomes, it cannot be sufficiently combatted with reason. Because "reason" becomes the state's tool to enforce. The Overton Window becomes weaponized - as we are seeing in @KellyannePolls and @seanspicer's "alternative facts." The state decides.

Liberalism literally cannot see this - its insistence on rule of law, not genocideal lust, is what turned the German people into good Nazis.

Some positions must be excluded from discourse. Some positions you do not listen to - u can only punch. A society that begins to entertain why some members of its polis might not belong invites catastrophic decay. Those voices must be excluded.

TL;DR - punching a nazi is actually a supreme act of democracy becausec it will not tolerate a direct affront of a fellow citizen's citizenship.

PS: https://punchingnazis.tumblr.com/

February 18 2017

gutscakeearshot
1964 605b 500
gutscakeearshot

July 10 2015

gutscakeearshot
6540 7014 500
gutscakeearshot
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl